Section 67.136, RSMo, authorizes municipal courts to use collection agencies to collect court or administrative fines or costs associated with a finding of guilt for a criminal offense or an infraction, or entry of a civil judgment owed, enforceable, past due and remained uncollected.
Section 488.5030, RSMo, authorizes courts to contract with public or private agencies which are under a contract with the Office of Administration or the Office of the State Courts Administrator (OSCA) to collect past-due court-ordered penalties, fines, sanctions, court costs, including restitution and juvenile monetary assessments, or judgments due to the state of Missouri or one of its political subdivisions. Fees and costs of collections shall be added to the amount due, but shall not exceed 20% of the amount collected.
Section 488.014, RSMo, states that courts are not required to collect any court costs due that total less than five dollars.
The debt collection agency under contract with OSCA as of January 1, 2018, is Municipal Service Bureau (MSB). Municipal courts may use the services provided by MSB and receive the same contracted collection rate as other municipal courts using the statewide case management system. Information regarding services provided by MSB, the current commission fee rate, and contact information can be obtained by sending an email to:
There is no statutory requirement that debtors be notified that their case may be referred to debt collection. Formal payment agreements are the best way to inform individuals of the consequences of not paying their court debt. (See GN185 – Payment Agreement form). In addition, some courts have posted notices and provided additional fliers to individuals needing additional time to pay their court debt that explain that their debt will be submitted to a debt collection agency if they fail to pay.
Bankruptcy
When a written notice of bankruptcy is received by the court or the vendor, federal law requires that all collection activities (i.e., notices, telephone calls, etc.) stop immediately. The notice does not discharge (excuse or dismiss) the debt. The court’s debt is only discharged if the debtor has listed the court as one of his or her creditors when the bankruptcy was filed. The court has to contact the bankruptcy court to determine if the debt was discharged.
When notice of bankruptcy is received, the court must immediately recall the debt from the debt collection vendor.
Tax Offset Program
Effective August 28, 2015, section 479.356, RSMo, provides that if a person fails to pay court costs, fines, fees, or other sums ordered by municipal court, to be paid to the state or political subdivision, the municipal court may report such delinquencies in excess of twenty-five dollars to the director of the department of revenue and request that the department seek a setoff of an income tax refund
Debt that has been submitted to Debt Collection may also be submitted for tax offset.
While it is recommended that courts utilize both tax offset and debt collection, the tax offset program is not currently available to courts that are not using OSCA’s statewide court automation system. If a court decides to use more than one collection activity, they must make sure that all payments and case information is entered promptly to ensure payment plan balances are current.
Debt Collected by Tax Offset and Debt Collection
When a court participates in both the debt collection and tax offset programs, there is a possibility that the debt will be collected by both programs and result in an overpayment. It is extremely important courts stay current in reviewing collection information received from both programs so that any overpayments can be identified and resolved as quickly as possible. Depending on which program collected the money and where the payment is when the overpayment is discovered will determine how the overpayment will be resolved.
§ When a new case (a case that has not been referred to debt collection previously) is identified, the programs will automatically update the “Date Sent to Collection” field on Custom Payment Plan Creation (CBAPLAN) with the date of extraction.
The following information is sent to CSI on each case referred for debt collection: § Transaction Type (i.e., is it a new case referred to debt collection or an update to a case that was previously referred);
§ Court JIS Location Code;
§ Circuit;
§ Payment Plan Number;
§ Defendant Party ID;
§ Case Number;
§ Case Type (criminal, traffic, etc.);
§ Case Description (style of case);
§ Defendant Name;
§ Defendant Address;
§ Defendant Date of Birth (if available);
§ Defendant Social Security Number (if available);
§ Defendant Driver’s License (if available);
§ Balance Due;
§ Original Due Date (due date of the final payment on the payment plan);
§ Case Filing Date;
§ Defendant Telephone Number (if available); and
§ Defendant Sex (male or female).
Update Process CSI will receive an electronic file twice daily, seven days a week to update information on cases referred previously for collection. The following updates are sent to CSI: 1. Payments 1.1 CSI will receive a balance update (i.e., amount of the payment) in the event an eligible payment is applied to a referred case. See sections 4.8a, Debt Collection, Appendix A, for instructions on entering payments on cases referred to debt collection. Eligible payments include: § Missouri Tax Intercept Payments – pay type code 1105 – Tax Intercept Elec Transfer. Payments received from DOR by courts that participate in the tax intercept program; § Debt Collection Payments – pay type code 1106 – Debt Collection Elec Transfer. Payments received from the collection agency for funds collected from debtors; and § Non-monetary write-off – pay type code 8520 – W/O Debt Collection Bad Debt. Non-monetary write-off of referred debt. These require a judicial order. 2. Payment Plan Balance Adjustments 2.1 CSI will receive payment plan balance adjustments when the balance due on a referred payment plan is adjusted. The balance adjustments may increase the balance due (i.e., the clerk adds the $25.00 time payment fee to the balance due) or decrease the balance due (i.e., the clerk forgot to record a payment received prior to referring the case to debt collection). See section 4.8a, Debt Collection, Appendix A, Payment Processing Procedures for JIS Courts Participating in the Debt Collection Program for instructions on entering balance adjustments in JIS. 3. Payment Plan Owner Information Updates 3.1 CSI will receive updated demographic information (i.e., name, address, driver’s license number, date of birth, telephone number, and social security number) on the owner of the payment plan in the event demographic information is changed or updated.
§ Placing cases on collection hold;
§ Releasing cases from collection hold;
§ Recalling cases from debt collection; and
§ Resending cases to debt collection.
See section 4.8a, Debt Collection, Appendix A, Payment Processing Procedures for JIS Courts Participating in the Debt Collection Program for instructions on performing these procedures. CSI receives an electronic file twice daily, seven days a week to update information on changes related to the referral status of a case. 1. Exempt Process 1.1 An exempt case is a case that has unpaid costs, fines and fees; however, the court has determined that the case will not be referred to CSI for collection. 1.2 Selecting the “Exempt from Debt Collection” checkbox on Custom Payment Plan Creation (CBAPLAN) will prevent a case from being referred for debt collection. 1.3 If a case has been marked exempt, the extraction programs will ignore the case, even if it meets all other criteria for referral. 1.4 The court should consider exempting a case when one or more of the following conditions exist on the case: § The court has ordered that the case be exempted from debt collection; § The defendant has made other payment arrangements with the court; § The court is unable to accurately determine the amount of debt due; and § The court has determined that the person on the case is not the defendant. 1.5 Exemption is not limited to the above conditions; however, the court should exercise care when exempting cases that do not fall into any of the above situations.