Order dated November 23, 2009, re: Revisions to MAI-CIVIL 2.01

Go to Orders and Rules
Official Court Seal

Supreme Court of Missouri
en banc

November 23, 2009

Effective July 1, 2010


IN RE: REVISIONS TO MAI-CIVIL
TABLE OF INSTRUCTIONS

MAI 2.01 EXPLANATORY INSTRUCTION FOR ALL CASES

ORDER


1.  Revisions of previously approved MAI-CIVIL Instructions and Committee Comments as listed above, having been prepared by the Committee on Jury Instructions - Civil and reviewed by the Court, are hereby adopted and approved.

2.  The Instructions and Committee Comments revised as set forth in the specific exhibits attached hereto must be used on and after July 1, 2010, and may be used prior thereto; any such use shall not be presumed to be error.

3.  It is further ordered that this order and the specific exhibits attached hereto shall be published in the South Western Reporter and the Journal of The Missouri Bar.

Day - to – Day

_____________________________
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR.
Chief Justice



2.01 [2010 Revision] Explanatory Instruction for All Cases

(Approved November 23, 2009; Effective July 1, 2010)


(1) GENERAL - JURY INSTRUCTIONS

(2) OPENING STATEMENTS

(3) EVIDENCE

(4) OBJECTIONS

(5) RULINGS OF LAW AND BENCH CONFERENCES

(6) OPEN MINDS AND NO PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS

(7) OUTSIDE INFLUENCES

(8) PROHIBITION OF JUROR RESEARCH OR COMMUNICATION ABOUT THIS    
      CASE

(9) FINAL INSTRUCTIONS
(10) CLOSING ARGUMENTS

(11) DELIBERATIONS
[(12) NOTETAKING
[(13) JUROR QUESTIONS

Committee Comment (2009 Revision)

(Approved November 23, 2009; Effective July 1, 2010)

Directions or admonitions:

a.  When MAI 2.01 is read to the jury at the beginning of the case, and when it is given in writing along with the other instructions at the end of the case, it should be given "as is" without further embellishment or explanation by the trial judge.

b.  However, directions or admonitions given by a trial judge to a jury during the course of trial are not instructions.  Examples of such directions or admonitions include a direction not to visit the scene of an accident or an oral repetition of the admonition to refrain from discussing the case during a recess.  Considerable discretion is afforded to the trial judge, subject to appropriate requests or objections of counsel, to determine the scope and frequency of such directions or admonitions.

c.  Directions or admonitions may be derived from parts of MAI 2.01, as may be appropriate under the circumstances of a particular case, or may be otherwise fashioned by the court with assistance of counsel.  The trial court should make a record of proposed admonitions or directions intended to be given to the jury, and an opportunity should be afforded to counsel to make requests, objections, or other record for appeal.  

d.  Such directions or admonitions may be used at the beginning of a case, before jury selection, throughout the trial, at each break in trial proceedings,  and at the conclusion of each day.  The trial court may decide that some directions or admonitions may be best delivered orally, by standardized typed cards for each juror, as a page in juror notebooks, by some combination thereof, or by some other method in the exercise of sound discretion.  The Committee does not intend rigorous requirements for the use of directions or admonitions, for the frequency of delivery thereof, nor for occasional omission thereof.  The guiding principles should always be the efficient administration of justice, fairness to the parties, and imparting to the jurors the importance of their individual and group roles in participating in our system of justice.
 
e.  The following directions or admonitions may be of assistance to the bench and bar, but are not intended by the Committee to be mandatory, exclusive or exhaustive.  Other directions or admonitions may also be appropriate under the circumstances of a given case.

Cell phones, other electronic devices:

The trial court has considerable discretion regarding the use of cell phones or other electronic devices in the courthouse and during trial.  Judicial discretion may be exercised by oral admonition, the addition of a paragraph regarding such devices at the end of MAI 2.01, or using a separate instruction.

Other appropriate admonitions or directions to the jury may be formulated and given by the trial judge as determined in light of the particular facts or circumstances of a given case.


Juror notetaking: 

Juror questions
Distribution of instructions:

Rule 70.02(f) requires that the final instructions of the court be given to the jury in writing.  While Rule 70.02 does not explicitly require that each juror be provided with a copy of the final instructions, such approach is implicitly permitted.  In its report to the Supreme Court of October 2000, the Civil Jury Study Committee recommended “that each juror be given a copy of the instructions before instruction reading, final argument, and deliberation.”  (Emphasis supplied.)  That committee also noted that juror “understanding increased significantly when each juror received his or her own copy of the instructions.”  The MAI Committee encourages compliance with this recommendation whenever feasible.

Back to top