Order dated May 20, 2009, re: Rules 51.15, 130, 110 to 129 and COR 23.01

Go to Orders and Rules
Official Court Seal

Supreme Court of Missouri
en banc

May 20, 2009
Effective January 1, 2010

In re:

(1) Repeal of subdivision 51.15, entitled "Disqualification of Family Court Commissioner," of Rule 51, entitled "Venue, Including Change of Venue and Change of Judge," and in lieu thereof adoption of a new subdivision 51.15, entitled "Change of Family Court Division Commissioner."

(2) Adoption of Rule 130, entitled "Family Court Division Commissioners," consisting of subdivisions 130.01 to 130.13, inclusive, and the comments thereto.

(3) Repeal of Court Operating Rule 23.01, entitled "Reporting Requirements for Child Abuse and Neglect Cases," and in lieu thereof adoption of new Court Operating Rule 23.01, entitled "Reporting Requirements for Child Abuse and Neglect Cases."

(4) Repeal of the rules of practice and procedure in the juvenile and family division of the circuit courts, consisting of Rules 110 to 129, inclusive, as well as all comments, source notes, and notes on use as well as Appendix A and Appendix B, and in lieu thereof adoption of new Rules 110 to 129, Appendix A, Appendix B, and Appendix C, as well as comments and cross-references contained therein.

ORDER

1.  It is ordered that effective January 1, 2010, subdivision 51.15 of Rule 51 be and the same is hereby repealed and a new subdivision 51.15 adopted in lieu thereof to read as follows:

2.  It is ordered that effective January 1, 2010, Rule 130, entitled "Family Court Division Commissioners," consisting of subdivisions 130.01 to 130.13, inclusive, and the comments thereto be and the same are hereby adopted to read as follows:

RULE 130   FAMILY COURT DIVISION COMMISSIONERS

3.  It is ordered that effective January 1, 2010, Court Operating Rule 23.01 be and the same is hereby repealed and a new Court Operating Rule 23.01 adopted in lieu thereof to read as follows:


4.  It is ordered that effective January 1, 2010, the rules of practice and procedure in the juvenile and family court divisions of the circuit courts, consisting of Rules 110 to 129, inclusive, as well as all comments, source notes, and notes on use as well as Appendix A and Appendix B be and the same are hereby repealed and new rules of practice and procedure in the juvenile and family court divisions of the circuit courts, consisting of Rules 110 to 129, adopted in lieu thereof as well as Appendix A, Appendix B, and Appendix C, as well as comments and cross-references contained therein to read as attached to this order.  

5.  It is ordered that notice of this order be published in the Journal of The Missouri Bar.

6.  It is ordered that this order be published in the South Western Reporter.

Day - to - Day

______________________
LAURA DENVIR STITH
Chief Justice



RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN JUVENILE AND FAMILY
COURT DIVISIONS OF THE CIRCUIT COURT

PART I.  RULES RELATING TO ALL JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS

RULE 110. GENERAL PROVISIONS

110.01  APPLICABILITY OF RULES

Comment

Any proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, is subject to, and governed by, the Adoption and Safe Families Act; therefore, judicial officers must be cognizant of, and comply with, the requirements of the act.

Appendix A, Standards for Operation of a Juvenile Detention Facility; Appendix B, Revised Missouri Standards for the Administration of Juvenile Justice; and Appendix C, Standards with Comments for Guardians ad Litem in Missouri Juvenile and Family Courts, are attached to, but are not part of, these rules.  


110.02  AUTHORITY FOR RULES

Comment

The rule-making power of the Supreme Court is granted by section 5 of article V of the Missouri Constitution, which provides:
The rules are to be construed to achieve the purposes of section 1.092, RSMo, and the juvenile code as set forth in section 211.011, RSMo.


110.03  PROCEDURE WHEN RULES NOT APPLICABLE
Comment

Section 211.171.7, RSMo, provides:  "The practice and procedure customary in proceedings in equity shall govern all proceedings in the juvenile court."

Section 487.160, RSMo, provides:  "Any reference in the statutory laws of this state to the juvenile division of the circuit court shall be deemed to include the family court when involving matters previously within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the juvenile division if such inclusion is not in conflict with the provisions of section 487.010 to 487.190."


110.04  DEFINITIONS

Comment

The definitions set forth in this Rule 110.04 do not apply to Appendix A, Appendix B, or Appendix C.  

The definitions set forth in this Rule 110.04 differ somewhat from those employed in the juvenile code.  Those changes have been made in the interest of consistency and ease of understanding.

"Child" is not defined in these rules.  Instead, the term "juvenile" is used.  The juvenile code employs the term "child," defining it in section 211.021(2), RSMo, to mean a person under 17 years of age, but the term itself is not consistently so used in the juvenile code; in many instances, the term also necessarily includes a person over the age of 17 years.  The definition of "juvenile" is used consistently in these rules.

As used in these rules, "children’s division" includes private agencies that have contracted with the children’s division to provide case management services.  Whenever the children's division is a party to a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, it shall be served with copies of all pleadings, motions, orders, judgments, and notices required by rule or statute to be served upon a party and shall receive all written reports, social records and other documents intended to be presented at any hearing for the court to review and consider.

Counsel may appear on behalf of the children’s division at any hearing held in accordance with Rules 123 and 124 in addition to, or in substitution for, the designated representative of the children’s division.  Upon entering an appearance, counsel for the children's division shall receive from the clerk, upon request, copies of all prior pleadings, motions, orders and judgments.  

A proceeding under subdivision (2) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, is governed by Rules 123 and 124 if the juvenile is placed in temporary protective custody or protective custody and by Rules 126 to 128 if the juvenile is placed in detention.

Cross-reference:  Sections 210.160.5, 210.481, 210.565.2, 210.817(4), 211.183.2, 211.183.9, 404.007(10), RSMo.


RULE 111. PRELIMINARY INQUIRY

111.01  PRELIMINARY INQUIRY
Comment

Under this Rule 111.01, it is not necessary that a judicial officer approve the filing of a petition.  See Rule 113.01.

Under the juvenile code, only the juvenile officer may file a petition.  State v. Taylor, 323 S.W.2d 534 (Mo. App. 1959).  This Rule 111.01 is not intended to modify the decision in Taylor.


RULE 112. INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT

112.01   INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT

Comment

The purpose of this Rule 112.01 is to ensure that the juvenile and the juvenile’s parents, guardian or custodian understand that the informal adjustment process is merely an offer by the juvenile officer of guidance and advice to the juvenile and the juvenile’s parents, guardian or custodian and does not constitute "official" action by the court that commands participation and compliance.
Cross-reference: Sections 453.110, 211.081, RSMo.


112.02  NOTICE TO PARTIES


112.03  INITIAL INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT CONFERENCE

Comment

Section 211.081, RSMo, provides that a court may "make such informal adjustment as practicable."  However, the juvenile code does not describe how an informal adjustment is to be accomplished.

Rule 112.03b is advisory and intended merely as a guideline for conducting the initial informal adjustment conference.  Modification of the procedures in Rule 112.03b to meet differing circumstances is permitted.


112.04  TERMINATION OF INFORMAL ADJUSTMENT

Comment

Under this Rule 112.04, the informal adjustment process may not in any event continue beyond a period of 12 months from the date of the informal adjustment agreement.  The purpose of a time limit upon the informal adjustment process is both to reduce the possibility of abuse and to require any long-range program for the juvenile or the juvenile’s parents, guardian or custodian to be approved by the court.

The informal adjustment process does not authorize detention of the juvenile unless permitted by the juvenile code or by these rules.


RULE 113. PETITION

113.01  STYLE AND CONTENT OF PETITION

Comment

This Rule 113.01 generally follows section 211.091, RSMo, in specifying the form and content of the petition.  However, the rule requires that the date of birth and sex of the juvenile appear in the caption and that the facts bringing the juvenile within the jurisdiction of the court be more clearly specified than required in section 211.091, RSMo.  Additionally, the rule provides that the petition may be filed upon the information and belief of the juvenile officer.

A petition alleging a violation of subdivision (3) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, shall state the alleged offense substantially in the form of the Missouri Approved Charges-Criminal.  If there is no applicable approved charge, the juvenile officer shall make certain that, in stating the alleged offense, the petition includes all elements of the offense charged.


113.02  AMENDMENT OF PETITION

Comment

If filing an amended petition in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, necessitates a continuance of a scheduled hearing on the petition, the judicial officer must consider the requirement in Rule 124.04a(2) that a hearing may be continued outside the time frames in Rule 124.01 only for compelling extenuating circumstances.

When the petition alleges violation by the juvenile of a state statute or municipal ordinance, care must be taken to comply with the requirements of due process if the petition is amended after the hearing on the petition has commenced.

Cross-reference:  Supreme Court Rules 55.53, 55.54.


113.03  RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS

Comment

A party filing a response to a pleading or motion must effect service of the response upon all parties pursuant to Rule 114.05.


RULE 114. SERVICE OF PROCESS AND SUBPOENA

114.01  SUMMONS AND SERVICE OF PETITION

Comment

If service of the petition cannot be effected by personal service or by registered or certified mail, the juvenile officer may, but is not required to, effect service by publication.

Rule 114.01f retains the provision of section 211.111.2, RSMo, requiring a minimum of only 24 hours notice of the hearing.  However, when circumstances permit, earlier notice should be given.

The constitutional standard of adequate notice of the allegations contained in the petition is set forth in In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967):

"Notice, to comply with due process requirements, must be given sufficiently in advance of scheduled court proceedings so that reasonable opportunity to prepare will be afforded * * *  [S]uch written notice [must] be given at the earliest practicable time, and in any event sufficiently in advance of the hearing to permit preparation * * * [Due process] does not allow a hearing to be held in which a youth’s freedom and his parents’ right to his custody are at stake without giving them timely notice, in advance of the hearing, of the specific issues that they must meet."


114.02  FORM AND CONTENT OF SUMMONS

114.03  WAIVER OF SERVICE BY PARENT, GUARDIAN OR CUSTODIAN

Comment

A parent, guardian or custodian of the juvenile may waive his or her right to service of summons but may not waive the right of the juvenile to such service.


114.04  WITNESS - SUBPOENA
Comment

This Rule 114.04 is broader in scope than section 211.101.4, RSMo, which provides:  "Subpoenas may be issued requiring the appearance of any other person whose presence, in the opinion of the judge, is necessary."

This Rule 114.04 gives a party a right to subpoena witnesses that the party deems necessary without being first required to convince a judicial officer of the necessity of the witness’ presence at the hearing.  The court may deal with any abuse of the power to request subpoenas in the same manner as in other civil and criminal cases.


114.05   SERVICE AND FILING OF OTHER PLEADINGS, MOTIONS AND NOTICES

Comment

Juvenile proceedings are civil in nature.  Pleadings subsequent to the original petition, motions and notices are to be served in the same manner as in other civil proceedings.


RULE 115. REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL

115.01  RIGHT TO COUNSEL
115.02  RIGHT OF JUVENILE TO APPOINTED COUNSEL

Comment

An attorney appointed as guardian ad litem for the juvenile may also be appointed as counsel for the juvenile unless a full and fair hearing requires separate counsel.

Rule 115.02f authorizes the court to assess attorney fees and costs only as specifically authorized by law.


115.03  RIGHT OF PARENTS, GUARDIAN OR CUSTODIAN TO APPOINTED COUNSEL

Comment

The court may at any time, sua sponte or at the request of a party, review whether a parent, guardian or custodian is or remains indigent and, if no longer indigent, discharge appointed counsel or, if now indigent, appoint counsel if requested and required for a full and fair hearing.


115.04  APPEARANCE BY COUNSEL

Comment

Counsel who enters an appearance in open court on the record by identifying himself or herself and the party he or she is representing shall, in addition, file with the court a written notice of appearance containing counsel’s current address and telephone number.

Upon entering an appearance, counsel shall receive from the clerk copies of all prior pleadings, motions, orders and judgments.


RULE 116. PROCEDURE

116.01  RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Comment

A complete record should be made of all testimony in any hearing.  Thereby, a record is provided for purposes of appeal, and, as noted in Gault, the judge is spared "the unseemly duty of testifying under cross-examination as to the events that transpired in the hearings before him."  387 U.S.1, 58 (1967).

This Rule 116.01 is not applicable to informal adjustment conferences under Rule 112.


116.02  RULES OF EVIDENCE

116.03  PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE

116.04  ORDER TERMINATING PROCEEDINGS

Comment

This Rule 116.04 embodies the underlying philosophy of the juvenile code as stated in section 211.011, RSMo.

When terminating jurisdiction over a juvenile placed outside Missouri in a proceeding under subdivision (1) or (2) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, the court and all parties must comply with the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children.  See section 210.620, RSMo.


RULE 117. PHYSICAL AND MENTAL EXAMINATION

117.01  PHYSICAL AND MENTAL EXAMINATION OF JUVENILE

Comment

This Rule 117.01 empowers the court to order a physical or mental examination of the juvenile in whose interest a petition or motion to modify has been filed under subsection 1 of section 211.031.1, RSMo.  However, the court may order the examination only after a petition or motion to modify has been filed.

A physical or mental examination of the juvenile made prior to the hearing on the petition or motion to modify may aid the court in determining, among other issues, whether the juvenile has been subjected to neglect or abuse or whether the juvenile is mentally responsible for his or her actions or in a fit condition to proceed.  Additionally, if the court determines that the juvenile is within its jurisdiction, the examination may aid the court in deciding the proper disposition or treatment of the juvenile.

Where the petition or motion to modify alleges a violation of state law or of a municipal ordinance and an examination under this Rule 117.01 is conducted prior to the hearing on the petition or motion to modify, the right of the juvenile not to incriminate himself or herself shall remain inviolate.

Cross-reference:  Section 552.020.11, RSMo.


117.02  PHYSICAL AND MENTAL EXAMINATION OF PARENTS, GUARDIAN
 OR CUSTODIAN  

Comment

A physical or mental examination of a juvenile's parent, guardian or custodian may be necessary to a full and proper adjudication of the allegations of a petition or motion to modify filed under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo.

Additionally, the court may need information at the dispositional hearing in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, concerning the physical or mental condition of a proposed custodian in determining whether to place the juvenile in out-of-home placement.

Because of the time frames in Rules 124.01a(2) and 124.01a(3), the court should consider at the protective custody hearing the need to order a physical or mental examination of a parent, guardian or custodian.


RULE 118. SOCIAL STUDY

118.01  SOCIAL STUDY

Comment

This Rule 118.01 makes clear that the court may use the social study only in connection with the dispositional hearing, and may neither read nor consider the social study until finding that the allegations of the petition or motion to modify have been established.

This Rule 118.01 in no way alters the obligation of the children’s division under section 207.020.1(17), RSMo, which requires the children’s division, prior to being vested with legal custody of a juvenile, to conduct an evaluation of the juvenile, investigate the background of the juvenile, and submit to the court a written report of its findings.

Cross-reference:  Sections 211.081, 211.171, RSMo.


RULE 119. JUDGMENT

119.01  JUDGMENT

119.02  AMENDMENT OF JUDGMENT
Comment

The purpose of this Rule 119.02 is to enable the court to amend or correct a judgment after entry, to make a judgment conform to the pleadings and evidence, and to reopen a judgment if additional evidence is necessary or additional circumstances exist that the court did not adequately consider when it entered the judgment.

This Rule 119.02 does not apply to a modification of a judgment based upon facts occurring subsequent to entry of the judgment, which is addressed in Rule 119.03.


119.03  MODIFICATION OF JUDGMENT AND TERMINATION OF JURISDICTION

Comment

This Rule 119.03 is not intended to suggest that a court without a hearing may modify a judgment or order so as to impose additional restraints upon the juvenile or upon the juvenile’s parents, guardian or custodian, to deprive the juvenile’s parents, guardian or custodian of custody of the juvenile, or to commit the juvenile to the division of youth services.

Whenever a motion to modify a judgment or order or to terminate jurisdiction is filed, the court shall ensure, prior to acting upon the motion, that all parties, the guardian ad litem and any court appointed special advocate receive a copy of the motion and are provided a reasonable opportunity to respond to the motion.

When terminating jurisdiction over a juvenile placed outside Missouri in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, the court and all parties must comply with the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children.  See section 210.620, RSMo.

When returning a juvenile from Missouri upon the filing of a petition by the juvenile’s home state, or placing a juvenile outside Missouri for supervision, in a proceeding under subdivision (2) or (3) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, the court and all parties must comply with the Interstate Compact on Juveniles.  See section 210.570, RSMo.


RULE 120. APPEALS

120.01  APPEALS

RULE 121. RECUSAL OR CHANGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICER

121.01  RECUSAL OF JUDICIAL OFFICER

121.02  CHANGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICER

Comment

A change of judicial officer under this Rule 121.02 may constitute a compelling extenuating circumstance for purposes of Rule 123.05 and Rule 124.04a(2).


121.03  PROCEDURE UPON RECUSAL OR CHANGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICER

121.04  LOCATION OF HEARINGS AFTER RECUSAL OR CHANGE OF JUDICIAL OFFICER
Comment

Under this Rule 121.04, the hearing on the petition shall be conducted within the county where venue lies under section 211.031, RSMo.  Subsequent hearings, including any hearings in connection with a petition filed under section 211.447, RSMo, may be conducted at a place convenient to the assigned judicial officer and the parties.


RULE 122. ACCESS TO HEARINGS AND RECORDS

122.01  OPEN HEARINGS

Comment

Exclusion of the juvenile’s parents, guardian or custodian is governed, in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, by Rule 124.03 and, in a proceeding under subdivisions (2) and (3) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, by Rule 128.01.

In determining whether to close a hearing under this Rule 122.01, the court may consider whether any member of the public may intentionally or inadvertently, but unnecessarily, disclose personal identifying information, such as the name, address, date of birth and telephone number, of the juvenile or a sibling, foster or adoptive parents, foster care institutions, or other persons and institutions providing care for the juvenile or a sibling.

Upon conclusion of a hearing in a proceeding governed by this Rule 122.01, the juvenile officer, attorney for the juvenile officer, children’s division, attorney for the children’s division, guardian ad litem or court appointed special advocate may provide, but is not limited to providing, the following information about the hearing:
Access of the public to hearings conducted in a proceeding under subdivision (3) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, is governed by section 211.171.6, RSMo.

Cross-reference:  Sections 211.319.1, 211.319.2, RSMo.


122.02  OPEN RECORDS

Comment

This Rule 122.02 does not prohibit distribution among the parties of written reports, social records and other documents to be presented at any hearing for the court to review and consider.  However, written reports, social records and other documents received by the court into evidence at a hearing are not accessible to the public under this Rule 122.02.

Access of the public to the pleadings and orders of the court in a proceeding filed under subdivision (3) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, is governed by section 211.321, RSMo.
Cross-reference:  Section 211.319.3, RSMo.


122.03  LAW ENFORCEMENT RECORDS OF JUVENILES TO BE KEPT SEPARATE


PART II RULES RELATING TO CHILD ABUSE AND
NEGLECT PROCEEDINGS.

RULE 123. CUSTODY

123.01  WHEN JUVENILE MAY BE TAKEN INTO JUDICIAL CUSTODY
Comment

This Rule 123.01 states the circumstances under which a juvenile may be taken into judicial custody under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo.

When determining whether to take a juvenile into judicial custody, a law enforcement officer, physician and juvenile officer must be cognizant of the decision in Heartland Academy Community Church v. Waddle, 427 F.3d 525 (8th Cir. 2005).

Questioning of a juvenile taken into judicial custody by a juvenile officer or law enforcement officer in connection with a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, regarding alleged abuse or neglect is governed by subsection 3 of section 211.059, RSMo.

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination in the first court order that removes the juvenile from the home whether continuation of the juvenile in the home is contrary to the welfare of the juvenile.  Therefore, the court must make this determination in any order under which a juvenile is taken into judicial custody under Rule 123.01a(1).  

Cross-reference:  Section 211.131.3, RSMo.


123.02   PROCEDURE UPON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR PHYSICIAN TAKING JUVENILE INTO JUDICIAL CUSTODY


Comment

Rule 123.02a follows the present statute by requiring a reasonable attempt to notify a juvenile’s parents, guardian or custodian when the juvenile is taken into judicial custody.  

Rule 123.02b requires a written report, rather than mere notification, to the juvenile officer.  This written report provides the juvenile officer with a documentary basis for deciding whether to release the juvenile or hold the juvenile in judicial custody.  

Further, Rule 123.02b adds the requirement that the report be submitted to the juvenile officer even if the juvenile is released so that the juvenile officer and, through the juvenile officer, the court will be apprised that a juvenile taken into judicial custody was subsequently released.
 
Cross-reference:  Sections 210.125, 211.131, RSMo.


123.03  TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE CUSTODY


123.04  COURT ACTION TO PLACE JUVENILE IN TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE CUSTODY


Comment

Section 211.032.3, RSMo, provides:  "A proceeding must be held within three business days of a petition being filed in all cases under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031."

A petition or motion to modify need not be filed for a juvenile officer, law enforcement officer or physician to take judicial custody of a juvenile.  However, a petition or motion to modify must be filed before a court may order temporary protective custody of a juvenile.

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination in the first court order that removes the juvenile from the home whether continuation of the juvenile in the home is contrary to the welfare of the juvenile.  Rule 123.04b(2) recognizes that, if the juvenile was not taken into judicial custody pursuant to an order of court under Rule 123.01a(1), the court must make this determination in the order for temporary protective custody.


123.05  PROTECTIVE CUSTODY HEARING

Comment

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination:

(1) in the first court order that removes the juvenile from the home whether continuation of the juvenile in the home is contrary to the welfare of the juvenile; and

(2) no later than 60 days from the date of the removal of the juvenile from the home whether reasonable efforts were made, or deemed to have been made, to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the juvenile from the home.

Under section 210.565, RSMo, grandparents who request consideration are given preference and first consideration for out-of-home placement, and a juvenile in out-of-home placement shall be placed with a relative whenever such placement is not contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

Under section 211.177, RSMo, grandparents have a right to intervene if custody of a grandchild is in issue unless the court determines that such intervention is contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.


123.06  RELEASE FROM PROTECTIVE CUSTODY UPON CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES


Comment

This Rule 123.06 recognizes that, following an order for protective custody, the circumstances that originally justified protective custody may change so that the juvenile safely can be released.  The rule provides a mechanism for calling to the attention of the court such change of circumstances.


123.07  PRELIMINARY CHILD WELFARE PROCEEDING

Comment

Section 211.032.3, RSMo, provides:  "A proceeding must be held within three business days of a petition being filed in all cases under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031."

If the juvenile who is the subject of the petition remains in the custody of his or her parent, guardian or custodian or is released from judicial custody pursuant to Rule 123.02c or Rule 123.04b(3)(A), the required "proceeding" may be merely an in camera meeting between the judicial officer and juvenile officer to address the identified preliminary issues.

The time periods prescribed in Rule 124.01a do not apply when the juvenile in whose interest a petition is filed under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, remains in the custody of the juvenile’s parent, guardian or custodian or is released from judicial custody to the custody of the juvenile’s parent, guardian or custodian.

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination in the first court order that removes the juvenile from the home whether continuation of the juvenile in the home is contrary to the welfare of the juvenile.  Therefore, the court must make this determination if temporary protective custody of the juvenile is ordered under Rule 123.07a(6).


123.08  DISCOVERY

Comment

This Rule 123.08 establishes a procedure for informal production of specific documents and records that are relevant to the allegations of the petition or a subsequent motion to modify because the time frame in Rule 124.01a(2) makes formal discovery under the rules of civil procedure impractical.

However, this Rule 123.08 does not prevent a party from engaging in formal discovery, which, in view of the time periods allowed under the rules of civil procedure, will, in most cases, necessitate that the hearing on the petition or motion to modify be held outside the time frame in Rule 124.01a(2).

Nothing in this Rule 123.08 shall be construed to supersede any state law or federal regulation that makes information in the possession of the children’s division confidential or which otherwise limits disclosure of information by the children’s division.

Additionally, nothing in this Rule 123.08 prevents the court, on its own motion or on the motion of any party, from entering a protective order for any document or record made available by the juvenile officer and children’s division pursuant to Rule 123.08a.

Finally, nothing in this Rule 123.08 shall be construed to alter the time period provided by statute for the children’s division to complete a hotline report.


RULE 124. HEARINGS

124.01  SCHEDULE OF HEARINGS

Comment

The time periods prescribed in Rule 124.01a do not apply when the juvenile in whose interest the petition or motion to modify is filed under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, is not in temporary protective custody.

The time periods prescribed in Rule 124.01b do not apply when the juvenile in whose interest the petition or motion to modify is filed under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, is not in the legal custody of the children’s division.

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination no later than 60 days from the date of the removal of the juvenile from the home whether reasonable efforts were made, or deemed to have been made, to prevent or eliminate the need for removal of the juvenile from the home.  Therefore, the court should include this determination in any order entered after a protective custody hearing under Rule 123.05 and must make this determination in any order entered after an adjudication hearing under Rule 124.06.

Additionally, for such juvenile to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination within 12 months of the date the juvenile is considered to have entered foster care and at least annually thereafter of the reasonable efforts of the children’s division to finalize the permanency plan in effect.  Therefore, the court should include this determination in any order entered after a dispositional review hearing under Rule 124.08 and must make this determination in any order after a permanency hearing under Rule 124.09.

Cross-reference:  Section 211.032, RSMo.


RULE 124.02  NOTICE OF HEARING

Comment

The current foster parents, or any pre-adoptive parent or relative currently providing care for a juvenile, must be provided with timely notice of, and has the right to be heard in, any hearing in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031.1, RSMo.

Cross-reference:  Sections 210.566.5, 211.171.3, 211.464, RSMo.  See also 42 U.S.C.§675(5)(G).


RULE 124.03  PRESENCE AND EXCLUSION OF JUVENILE AND JUVENILE’S PARENTS, GUARDIAN OR CUSTODIAN

Comment

Section 211.171.2, RSMo, provides:  "The hearing may, in the discretion of the court, proceed in the absence of the child and may be adjourned from time to time."


124.04.  CONTINUANCES

Comment

This Rule 124.04 is patterned after Rule 65.01, except that any continuance shall not only be to a fixed day but also to a fixed time, and after Rule 65.03, except that all parties, not just the adverse party, must consent to an oral application for continuance.  Further, this Rule 124.04 specifically advises counsel that any application for continuance on behalf of a party who cannot be consulted must contain counsel’s efforts to consult with the party.

The failure to make the specified reasonable efforts findings within the time frames required by Titles IV-B and IV-E of the Social Security Act may result in loss of federal funds not only for the care of a particular juvenile but also for the state’s child welfare programs.  Therefore, even when a continuance is granted, the court remains obligated under the Adoption and Safe Families Act to make the finding required under Rule 124.04g(1) no later than 60 days from the date of removal of the juvenile from the home and the finding required under Rule 124.04g(2) within 12 months of the date the juvenile is considered to have entered foster care and at least annually thereafter.

Cross-reference:  Section 211.171.7, RSMo.


124.05  UNTIMELY HEARINGS

Comment

Rule 124.04 permits hearings, other than protective custody hearings, to be continued outside the time frames established in Rules 124.01a and 124.01b only for compelling extenuating circumstances.  Rule 123.05c governs continuances of protective custody hearings.

This Rule 124.05b provides parties with an expedited procedure to address the failure of the court to hold a hearing in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, within the applicable time frame in Rule 124.01.

See Court Operating Rule 23, which requires each circuit to submit to this Court and the commission on retirement, removal and discipline a quarterly report for each hearing in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, not held within the applicable time frame in Rule 124.01.

Cross-reference:  Section 211.032.6, RSMo.


124.06  ADJUDICATION HEARING

Comment

The purpose of the adjudication hearing is to determine whether the allegations in the petition are established.  The allegations in the petition are proved only by evidence that is at least clear and convincing.

Under section 210.127.1, RSMo, the children’s division is required to utilize all reasonable and effective means available to conduct a diligent search for any biological parent of a juvenile whose identity or location is unknown.

The lack of service on a parent, guardian or custodian does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to proceed.  See Rule 114.01e.

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination:

Rule 124.06g recognizes that, if the dispositional hearing does not immediately follow the adjudication hearing, the court must include in the adjudication order whichever of these determinations has not been previously made.

Cross-reference:  Section 211.032.4, RSMo.


124.07  DISPOSITIONAL HEARING

Comment

The purpose of the dispositional hearing is to determine: (1) the legal and physical custody of the juvenile, and (2) whether the children’s division is required to engage in reasonable efforts to reunify the family and, if so, the reasonable efforts necessary to effect reunification.  

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination:
The Adoption and Safe Families Act requires, upon a judicial determination pursuant to section 211.183.7, RSMo, that the children’s division is not required to engage in reasonable efforts to reunify the family, that a permanency hearing be held within 30 days and, in the absence of an applicable statutory exception, that a petition for termination of parental rights be filed within 60 days of such determination.

The Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination within 12 months of the date a juvenile is considered to have entered foster care of the reasonable efforts of the children’s division to finalize the permanency plan that is in effect.  Therefore, a permanency hearing must be scheduled if insufficient time exists to conduct a dispositional review hearing before a permanency hearing must be held.

Under section 210.565, RSMo, grandparents who request consideration are given preference and first consideration for out-of-home placement, and a juvenile in out-of-home placement shall be placed with a relative whenever such placement is not contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

Under section 211.177, RSMo, grandparents have a right to intervene if custody of a grandchild is in issue unless the court determines that such intervention is contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

When placing a juvenile outside Missouri, including placing with a parent or relative, or terminating jurisdiction over a juvenile placed outside Missouri, in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, the court and all parties must comply with the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children.  See section 210.620, RSMo.

Cross-reference:  Sections 211.032.4, 210.127.2, 211.183.7, 211.447.2, 211.447.3, 211.447.4, RSMo.


RULE 124.08  DISPOSITIONAL REVIEW HEARING

Comment

Under section 210.565, RSMo, grandparents who request consideration are given preference and first consideration for out of home placement, and a juvenile in out of home placement shall be placed with a relative whenever such placement is not contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

Under section 211.177, RSMo, grandparents have a right to intervene if custody of a grandchild is in issue unless the court determines that such intervention is contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

Cross-reference:  Sections 211.032.4, 210.127.2, RSMo.


124.09  PERMANENCY HEARING

Comment

This Rule 124.09 governs not only the initial permanency hearing but also each subsequent annual permanency hearing.

Annual permanency hearings are required, even after the parents’ rights have been terminated, until the juvenile attains age 21 or until the earlier entry of a legally final permanency order; i.e., return of the juvenile to the legal custody of a parent, adoption or guardianship.

Under the Adoption and Safe Families Act, a permanency hearing must be open to the participation of the juvenile, the parents, guardian or custodian of the juvenile, and the current foster parents, or any pre-adoptive parent or relative currently providing care for the juvenile, and may not be merely a paper review, ex parte hearing, or agreed upon order.

At the permanency hearing, the judicial officer should consult in person, where age appropriate, with the juvenile regarding the proposed permanency plan.

At any permanency hearing addressing transition of the juvenile from foster care to independent living, the judicial officer should consult in person with the juvenile regarding the manner in which the children’s division can assist the juvenile’s transition from foster care, including the availability of resources under the Foster Care Independence Act of 1999.

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination within 12 months of the date the juvenile is considered to have entered foster care and at least annually thereafter of the reasonable efforts of the children’s division to finalize the permanency plan in effect.  This Rule 124.09 recognizes that the court must make this determination at each permanency hearing.

If reunification is not the permanency plan that is most appropriate for the juvenile, the permanency plan for the juvenile must be one of the following:
The Adoption and Safe Families Act requires, with certain exceptions, the filing of a petition for termination of parental rights by the end of the 15th month when a juvenile has been in foster care for 15 of the most recent 22 months, or within 60 days of a judicial determination that the children’s division is not required to make reasonable efforts to reunify the family because a parent has committed a statutorily identified crime.

There is no requirement under the Adoption and Safe Families Act or the Missouri statutes that an appropriate adoptive resource be identified or that the juvenile be placed with an appropriate adoptive resource before the court may find adoption to be the permanency plan that is most appropriate for the juvenile and order the filing of a petition for termination of parental rights.

The Adoption and Safe Families Act allows a juvenile’s permanency plan to be another planned permanent living arrangement only when the children’s division documents compelling reasons why the other permanency plans are not in the best interests of the juvenile.

Under section 210.565, RSMo, grandparents who request consideration are given preference and first consideration for out-of-home placement, and a juvenile in out-of-home placement shall be placed with a relative whenever such placement is not contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

Under section 211.177, RSMo, grandparents have a right to intervene if custody of a grandchild is in issue unless the court determines that such intervention is contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

When placing a juvenile outside Missouri, including placing with a parent or relative, or terminating jurisdiction over a juvenile placed outside Missouri, in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, the court and all parties must comply with the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children.  See section 210.620, RSMo.

Cross-reference:  42 U.S.C. §677; Sections 211.032.4, 211.171.1, 210.720, 211.447.2, 211.447.3, and 211.447.4, RSMo.


124.10  PERMANENCY REVIEW HEARING

Comment

This Rule 124.10 governs not only the initial permanency review hearing but also each subsequent permanency review hearing.

Permanency review hearings are required, even after the parents’ rights have been terminated, until the juvenile attains age 21 or until the earlier entry of a legally final permanency order; i.e., return of the juvenile to the legal custody of a parent, adoption or guardianship.

If reunification is not the permanency plan that is most appropriate for the juvenile, the permanency plan for the juvenile must be one of the following:

The considerations for the court in determining, pursuant to Rule 124.10c(3), whether the children’s division has made reasonable efforts to finalize the permanency plan in effect and, pursuant to this Rule 124.10c(4)(a), which permanency plan is most appropriate for the juvenile, are detailed in Rule 124.09e.

The Adoption and Safe Families Act allows a juvenile’s permanency plan to be another planned permanent living arrangement only when the children’s division documents compelling reasons why the other permanency plans are not in the best interests of the juvenile.

For a juvenile in the legal custody of the children’s division in a proceeding under subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, to be eligible for Title IV-E funding, the Adoption and Safe Families Act requires a judicial determination within 12 months of the date the juvenile is considered to have entered foster care and at least annually thereafter of the reasonable efforts of the children’s division to finalize the permanency plan in effect.  Therefore, this determination may be made at a permanency review hearing under this Rule 124.10.

Under section 210.565, RSMo, grandparents who request consideration are given preference and first consideration for out-of-home placement, and a juvenile in out-of-home placement shall be placed with a relative whenever such placement is not contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

Under section 211.177, RSMo, grandparents have a right to intervene if custody of a grandchild is in issue unless the court determines that such intervention is contrary to the best interests of the juvenile.

When placing a juvenile outside Missouri, including placing with a parent or relative, or terminating jurisdiction over a juvenile placed outside Missouri, in a proceeding under subdivision (1) of subsection 1 of section 211.031, RSMo, the court and all parties must comply with the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children.  See section 210.620, RSMo.

Cross-reference:  Sections 211.032.4, 211.171.1, 210.720, 211.183, and 211.447.2, RSMo.


PART III. RULES RELATING TO TERMINATION OF PARENTAL
RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS

RULE 125. TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS

125.01  TERMINATION, WHEN


125.02  STYLE AND CONTENT OF PETITION


125.03  ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS

PART IV. RULES RELATING TO STATUS AND
DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS.

RULE 126. RIGHTS OF JUVENILE

126.01  NOTIFICATION OF RIGHTS


RULE 127. DETENTION

127.01  WHEN JUVENILE MAY BE TAKEN INTO JUDICIAL CUSTODY


127.02  PROCEDURE UPON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TAKING JUVENILE INTO JUDICIAL CUSTODY



127.03  DESIGNATION OF DETENTION FACILITY


127.04  PRESENTATION OF JUVENILE TO JUVENILE OFFICER OR DETENTION FACILITY



127.05  NOTICE UPON ADMISSION TO DETENTION FACILITY


127.06  DETENTION


127.07  COURT ACTION UPON NOTICE THAT JUVENILE IS DETAINED


127.08  DETENTION HEARING


127.09  RELEASE FROM DETENTION UPON CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES


127.10  RIGHTS DURING SECURE DETENTION


127.11  DISCOVERY


RULE 128. HEARINGS

128.01  PRESENCE AND EXCLUSION OF JUVENILE AND JUVENILE’S PARENTS, GUARDIAN OR CUSTODIAN


128.02   ADJUDICATION HEARING


128.03  DISPOSITIONAL HEARING

RULE 129.  DISMISSAL TO ALLOW PROSECUTION
UNDER GENERAL LAW

129.01  ORDER FOR HEARING


129.02  NOTICE OF HEARING
 

129.03  INVESTIGATION


129.04  DISMISSAL HEARING

Appendix A  

Standards for Operation of a Juvenile Detention Facility

Table of Sections

Section
SECTION 1.   PHYSICAL  PLANT

The construction of new facilities or the remodeling of an existing structure shall incorporate the following standards during design and construction.

Essential Elements

Cross-reference:
Section 2.  Administration

Essential Elements
Section 3.    Personnel Management

Essential Elements

Section 4.   Programs and Services

Essential Elements
Section 5.   Training and Staff Development

Essential Elements

Section 6.   Intake and Admissions

Essential Elements
Section 7.   Juvenile Rights

Essential Elements
Section 8.  Communication Provisions

Essential Elements
Section 9.   Rules and Discipline

Essential Elements
Section 10.  JUVENILE RECORDS

Essential Elements
Section 11. SECURITY AND CONTROL

Essential Elements
Section 12.  Safety and Emergency Procedures


Essential Elements
Section 13.  Hygiene and Sanitation

Essential Elements
Section 14.   Medical Services

Essential Elements

Section 15.   Food Services

Essential Elements
Section 16.  Release

Essential Elements


Appendix  B  

Revised Missouri Standards for the Administration of Juvenile Justice

Ahead are the eight general performance areas recommended by the Missouri Standards for the Administration of Juvenile Justice Committee.  A brief summary of the rationale behind each performance area, the performance indicators for the standard, and recommended methods for measuring the standard are included.

I.  Access to Juvenile Justice Services

Every effort should be made to create opportunities for effective and meaningful participation in the justice process without undue inconvenience or hardship.

A.  Availability of services

B.  Equal access
C.  Courtesy, respect, and sensitivity
Performance indicators

Potential measurement methods

II. Independence and Integrity

Institutional independence and integrity are of paramount importance.  Juvenile justice professionals should be free from undue influence from other components of government or other entities.
Performance indicators

Potential measurement methods

III.  Timeliness and Responsiveness

Policies should be in place to ensure that case processing and other juvenile office practices are conducted in a timely manner.  Compliance with time standards encouraging efficiency and responsiveness should be established and monitored.

A.  Referrals from other courts or entities, and requests for courtesy supervision

Upon receipt, requests for court services from other courts and entities should be date-stamped "received" and responded to within five business days of receipt.

B.  Requests for information or services
C.  Timely monitoring and enforcement of court orders
Performance indicators
Potential measurement methods

IV. Records
A.  Juvenile file

For each child referred to the juvenile office, accurate, complete, and up-to-date records should be kept.  The information should be both relevant and necessary to a proper purpose.  Reasonable safeguards should be established to protect against the misuse, misinterpretation, and improper dissemination of file information.

B.  Maintenance of records

Juvenile records are generally confidential.  Access to and destruction of juvenile records is controlled by section 211.321, RSMo.

Performance indicators

File information is reliable, accurate, and relevant.

Potential measurement methods

Review of case files.
Surveys of file users.

A standard describing proper procedure for maintaining records underscores the importance of documenting juvenile justice processes.


V.  Victim and Family Rights

Victims should be recognized as persons with a legitimate interest in the justice system.  The child's family members should be recognized as persons with a legitimate interest in the justice system and the welfare of the child.  Juvenile justice professionals should treat family members with dignity and respect while focusing on the safety and well being of the child.
Performance indicators

Satisfactory level of family and victim participation in juvenile justice processes.
Families perceive juvenile office staff as respectful of their rights and responsive to their child's needs.
Victims perceive juvenile office staff as responsive and respectful of their rights.
Victim advocates perceive juvenile office staff as respectful toward victim rights and responsive to victims.
Families and child advocates perceive juvenile office staff as respectful toward family rights and responsive to children and families.

Potential measurement methods

Systematic observations using trained observers.
Survey of family members and family advocates.
Record reviews (regarding victim participation).
Focus groups with family members and family advocates.
Focus groups with victim and victim advocates.
Structured interviews with family members and advocates.
Structured interviews with victims, family members, and advocates.
Number of contacts made with victims.
Number of contacts responded to by victims.
The victim and family rights standard addresses the role of the victim in the juvenile justice process and reflects themes of restorative justice.  This standard explicitly recognizes that the victim has an important role in the justice process and a stake in its outcomes.  It ensures that victims are not marginalized and that their input is valued and can help inform recommendations.
The standard explicitly recognizes that the family is valued and has an important role in the juvenile and family court process.
VI.  Case Processing

Court referral and intake services should be available seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day.

A.  Referral and intake

1.  Legal sufficiency

A referral of delinquency or child abuse and neglect shall be date-stamped "received."  If information is received verbally, it shall be reduced to writing as soon as possible.

a.  The intake officer should make an initial and prompt determination of whether the referral is legally sufficient for the filing of a petition on the basis of the contents of the referral and intake investigation.  In this regard, the officer should determine whether:

i.  The facts as alleged are legally sufficient to establish the court’s jurisdiction over the child;

ii.  There is a clear statement of the acts alleged;

iii. There is competent and credible evidence sufficient to support the filing of a petition; and

iv.  All acts arising out of one referral are included in one petition.

b.  If the legal sufficiency of the referral is unclear, the officer should:

i.  Cause or initiate further investigation; or
ii.  Consult with legal counsel.

c.  If the officer determines that the facts as alleged are not sufficient to
establish the court's jurisdiction, the officer should dismiss/reject the referral or, where appropriate, forward the referral to the appropriate authority.

d.  The intake disposition of the referral should be made within 30 calendar days from the date stamped "received".

2.  Notice to parties

Every effort should be made to ensure that all parties are provided with timely notice of proceedings.

a.  Informal adjustment - Notice of informal adjustment shall be given to parties, as required by Rule 112.02.

b.  Summons and service of petitions and other pleadings - Notice shall be given to parties, as required by Rules 114.01 to 114.05.

3.  Informal case processing

Review of prior referrals to the juvenile office and past involvement with the child welfare agency, along with a determination of the safety of the child, should be used as a guideline for arriving at the decision to dispose of a referral through the informal process.

a.  Upon a decision to make an informal adjustment, the Supreme Court rules that govern the informal adjustment process shall guide the informal case processing of all cases.

b.  The informal adjustment disposition should be made on or within 30 calendar days from intake disposition.

c.  During the informal adjustment conference and after the allegations are found sufficient, the officer shall conduct a risk and needs assessment and classification of the child in all delinquency cases.

d.  In delinquency cases, as a result of the informal adjustment and classification of the child, the officer should determine what disposition (sanctions/services) is in the best interest of the child and community.

e.  In child abuse and neglect cases, as a result of the informal adjustment, the officer should determine what disposition and services are in the best interest of the child and family.

f.  Within five business days of determining a disposition, the disposition, results of any risk and needs assessment completed, and services and sanction(s) utilized shall be reported to the court and the office of state courts administrator (OSCA) using a standardized form (sections 211.141 and 211.327, RSMo).

g.  The juvenile officer or the juvenile officer's designee should conduct the informal adjustment conference.  The juvenile officer or designee has authority to provide for any disposition available.  Any services available to the court should be available at the informal adjustment conference.

h.  In delinquency cases, an agreement should be signed signifying the child and custodian(s) accept the terms of the informal adjustment.  This agreement should be maintained in the child's file, and a copy of the agreement should be provided to the child and custodian(s) upon signing.

i.  In child abuse/neglect cases, an agreement or children's division safety plan should be signed signifying that the child's parent, guardian, or legal custodian, the children's division worker (if appropriate), and the juvenile officer accept the terms of the informal adjustment conference.  This agreement should be maintained in the child's file, and a copy of the agreement should be provided to the parent, guardian, or legal custodian and, when applicable, the children's division worker.

4.  Formal case processing

a.  Upon a decision to authorize temporary protective custody or detention, Supreme Court rules should be strictly adhered to (Rules 123 and 127).

b.  Upon a decision to file a petition, the Supreme Court rules that govern formal case processing should be strictly adhered to (Rules 113.01 to 113.03).

c.  During formal case processing in delinquency cases, the officer shall conduct a risk assessment and classification of the child (section 211.121, RSMo) pursuant to the Missouri Juvenile Offender Risk & Needs Assessment Classification System.

d.  Every effort should be made to ensure that all necessary persons are provided with timely notice of proceedings, as required by statutes and Supreme Court rules.

e.  In delinquency cases, within five business days of the court entering a disposition, the disposition, results of the risk assessment, needs assessment, and the sanction(s)/service(s) utilized shall be reported to the court and the office of state courts administrator using a standardized form (sections 211.141 and 211.327, RSMo).

Performance indicators

Consistent case recommendations across like cases.
Efficient use of services.
Identified areas of service needs are met.
Identified time standards are being met.

Potential measurement methods

Review/comparison of case recommendations across like cases.
Surveys of service providers (regarding appropriateness of referrals).
Review of case outcomes across like cases.
Surveys/structured interviews with child and parents/guardians.
Review of case files.
Review of management report.
The case processing standards offer a best practice model from the point at which a referral is received until a case is closed.  These standards were created to foster consistency in case-processing and to ensure that practices are just and equitable and that actions are timely.
Use of the Missouri Juvenile Offender Risk & Needs Assessment and Classification System is not applicable to child abuse and neglect cases.

VII. Dispositions

A.  Supervision procedures
a.  Informal adjustment with supervision - Informal adjustment with supervision cannot exceed a period of six months, unless extended by court order.  Informal adjustment may not continue beyond a period of one year (Rule 112.04).
b.  Court adjudication/supervision of delinquency cases - The duration of formal supervision should be based on the child's risk and needs levels and adjustment under supervision.
2.  Contact standards - delinquency cases
Written guidelines should be in place pertaining to the frequency and nature of contacts that should be made with the child during the period of supervision.  These guidelines should take into account public safety and be based upon the Missouri risk scale and the severity of the presenting offense.  Contact standards should be graduated and may increase or decrease during the period of supervision.  The decision to adjust the level should be based on receipt of new referrals, violations of supervision, compliance with treatment service(s), and risk level changes.
Recommended minimums for contact standards are provided below.
a.  Informal adjustment with supervision - Informal adjustment may or may not include supervision.  Informal adjustment with supervision should include a minimum of one face-to-face contact per month with the child or his or her custodian for the duration of the informal adjustment period.
b.  Formal supervision - The frequency and type of contact should correspond to the supervision level.
i.  High level supervision should include a minimum of four face-to-face contacts monthly with the child at the juvenile office, child's home, school, or other community setting, one of which includes a parent or custodian, supplemented by collateral contacts as needed.
ii.  Moderate level supervision should include a minimum of two face-to-face contacts monthly with the child at the juvenile office, child's home, school, or other community setting, one of which includes a parent or custodian, supplemented by collateral contacts as needed.
iii.  Minimum level supervision should include a minimum of one face-to-face contact monthly with the child, which should include a parent or custodian, supplemented by collateral contacts as needed.
c.  Treatment contacts - Written guidelines should be in place pertaining to the frequency and nature of contacts that should be made with the child's treatment providers during the period of supervision.
3.  Upon termination of the informal case process, the juvenile officer shall notify the child's parent, guardian or legal custodian and, if applicable, the children's division, and report such action to the court.
B.  Case monitoring
All sanctions, services and dispositions should be monitored in all cases to ensure compliance.
1.  Progress reports in delinquency cases
The juvenile officer should complete progress reports at a minimum of every three months.  Progress reports should address compliance with conditions of supervision, services received, new referrals to the court, and changes in risk level.
The progress report should be submitted to the court for formal cases and maintained in the child's file for all cases.  Notification of progress or lack of it should be provided to the child and parent or guardian.
2.  Documentation of results
The results of monitoring and outcome(s) should be documented when the case is terminated.  This documentation should be maintained in the child's file.
C.  Formal case processing in child abuse/neglect cases
1.  The juvenile officer should provide on-going case monitoring to assure that each child's case moves through the dispositional review hearing, permanency hearing, permanency review hearing, and, when applicable, termination of parental rights hearing, as required by statute and Supreme Court rules.
2.  The juvenile officer is responsible for formal case processing and case monitoring activities that may include, but not be limited to:
a.  Preparation and filing of pleadings (e.g., motions for visitation, child support, or establishment of paternity);
b.  Ensuring the issuance of notices, summons, or subpoenas;
c.  Review of all written reports received from the children's division and others (e.g., medical, law enforcement, therapists, school, other treatment providers);
d.  Preparation and presentation in court, including preparation of witnesses, presenting evidence, and making recommendations;
e.  Preparation of memoranda and drafts of court orders;
f.  Monitoring the case for compliance with court orders and initiating action necessary to ensure compliance; and
g.  The juvenile officer should participate in the children's division family support team (FST) meetings.
D.  Case closing
1.  Informal adjustment
Informal adjustment should be terminated as required by Rule 112.04.
2.  Court supervision
Formal supervision should be terminated as required by Rule 119.03.
3.  Exit interview
For both formal and informal cases, an exit interview should be conducted with the child and child's parent or guardian to: a) notify them of the recommendation to discharge; b) review services provided; and c) receive comments and recommendations. A copy of the results of the exit interview should be placed in the child's file.
E.  Specific services utilized.
Performance indicators
Reduced recidivism.
Reduced reports of child maltreatment.
Reduced length of time children remain in alternative care.
Consistent case decisions/recommendations across like cases.
Identified areas of service needs are met.
Reduced delays in case processing.
Potential measurement methods.
Analysis of referrals, numbers, and types.
Review/comparison of case decisions/recommendations across like cases.
Surveys/structured interviews with children, parents/guardians, care providers, victims, and legal representatives, as appropriate.
The disposition standard for delinquency cases puts forth a best practice standard concerned with issues of public safety and the importance of utilizing the least restrictive intervention for the child.  Adherence to the supervision level described in this standard is intended to ensure that communities are safer from offenders while habilitation efforts are administered to decrease the likelihood of delinquent behavior by the child.
The disposition standard for child abuse and neglect cases puts forth a best practice standard concerned with issues of child safety, well-being, and timely permanency decision-making, whether through the informal or formal case process.
VIII. Detention Facilities and Services
Procedures for use of detention facilities and polices governing the treatment and rights of detained youth shall be in compliance with Rules 127.01 to 127.11.  A sufficiently wide range of detention services should be available so that the least restrictive interim option appropriate to the child's needs and community safety may be selected.
When a detention facility has bedspace available, every effort should be made to accommodate youth regardless of that youth's county of residence or the court having jurisdiction.

Performance indicators
Enhanced availability of detention facilities and services.
Increased community safety.
Public awareness of availability of detention facilities/services.
Potential measurement methods.
Record review (relevant to decisions to hold and availability of resources).
Analysis of pre-disposition recidivism.
Surveys of local citizens.
This standard was created to ensure that there are sufficient resources available to detain youth that present a significant risk and that detention resources are used judiciously.  The standard encourages resource sharing among circuits that have detention facilities and services and promotes development and use of less restrictive options when appropriate.
Cross-reference:
Missouri Revised Statutes
  Section 211.141, RSMo, "Child Returned to Parent..."
Supreme Court Rule
Rule 127.09, "Release from Detention..."
Missouri Juvenile Justice Association Detention Standards
Section 2, "Administration", Item 2.13
Section 6, "Intake and Admissions", Items 6.2 and 6.3
Section 8, "Communication Provisions", Item 8.7
Section 10, "Juvenile Records", Items 10.2 and 10.4
Section 14, "Medical Services", Item 14.16
Appendix C

Standards with Comments for Guardians ad Litem in Missouri Juvenile
and Family Court Division Matters.

STANDARD 1.0  Appointment of Guardians ad litem
Only a lawyer licensed by the Supreme Court of Missouri and, when authorized by law, a court appointed special advocate volunteer sworn in as an officer of the court shall be appointed to act as a guardian ad litem for a child.  The guardian ad litem shall be appointed not later than the first proceeding at which a guardian ad litem is required by law and shall remain involved until the matter in which the guardian ad litem is appointed is concluded or as otherwise ordered by the court.  
*   *   *
COMMENT:  Courts may appoint either a lawyer or a court appointed special advocate volunteer to serve as guardian ad litem in accordance with Missouri law in juvenile matters, family court division matters, and domestic relations matters, as set forth in chapters 210, 211, 452, 453 and 455, RSMo.

Missouri children deserve quality guardian ad litem representation, whether by a lawyer or a volunteer.  To ensure the best possible guardian ad litem services, there needs to be clarity and consistency in defining the role and responsibilities of the guardian ad litem.  To perform his or her duties effectively, the guardian ad litem requires knowledge of the role, understanding of the court's expectations, and knowledge of the criteria used to judge his or her performance.

STANDARD 2.0  Independent Judgment of Guardian ad litem

A guardian ad litem, whether a lawyer or a volunteer, shall be guided by the best interests of the child and shall exercise independent judgment on behalf of the child in all matters.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  Although the parties are interested in the child's well-being, they are not necessarily focused on the best interests of the child.  The guardian ad litem, therefore, (1) must recommend only what is in the best interests of the child on each issue, and (2) must maintain an objectivity that preserves a clear focus on the child's best interests.


The roles of a guardian ad litem and a lawyer for the child are different and must be clearly distinguished.  A lawyer guardian ad litem is not the lawyer for the child and, therefore, advocates the best interests of the child rather than merely representing the child's preferences.

STANDARD 3.0  Faithful Performance of Duties

The court shall assure that the guardian ad litem maintains independent representation of the best interests of the child.  The court shall require the guardian ad litem to perform the guardian ad litem duties faithfully and, upon failure to do so, shall discharge the guardian ad litem and appoint another.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  The guardian ad litem should relate to the child according to the child's stage of development and understand the child's sense of time in relation to his or her age.  The guardian ad litem should conduct regular face-to-face meetings with the child, which will allow the guardian ad litem to observe the child's physical, mental, social, educational and familial well-being and to form opinions concerning the underlying cause of any developmental disturbances the child may exhibit.  The guardian ad litem shall not diagnose or work therapeutically with the child, but regular, face-to-face contact will ensure informed observations when conferring with other specialists.

STANDARD 4.0  Volunteer Advocates

If the court appoints a court appointed special advocate volunteer, the services of a lawyer shall be obtained by the volunteer program supporting the volunteer when the volunteer has need for legal advice and assistance.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  Volunteers, trained and supervised by court appointed special advocate programs and sworn in as officers of the court, may be appointed to serve as guardians ad litem in certain designated cases.  When a volunteer serves as a guardian ad litem, a lawyer must be available to represent and, where appropriate, advise the volunteer.

STANDARD 5.0  Guardian ad litem Access to Child
The guardian ad litem shall not be unduly restricted in access to the child by any agency or person.  The guardian ad litem should meet with the child in the child's placement as often as necessary to determine that the child is safe and to ascertain and represent the child's best interests.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  Every child should have a guardian ad litem who is objective and independent and aware of and knowledgeable about the child's particular situation.

STANDARD 6.0  Guardian ad litem Access to Reports and Records

Unless otherwise provided by law, the guardian ad litem shall be provided, upon request, with all reports relevant to the case made to or by any agency or any person and shall have access to all relevant records of such agencies or persons relating to the child or the child's family members or placements of the child.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  Except as otherwise provided by law, the guardian ad litem must have complete access to all information related to the child and the child's situation.  See  section 210.160.2, RSMo.

STANDARD 7.0  Confidentiality

A guardian ad litem shall observe all statutes, rules and regulations concerning confidentiality.  A guardian ad litem shall not disclose information, or participate in the disclosure of information, relating to an appointed case to any person who is not a party to the case, except as necessary to perform the guardian ad litem duties or as may be specifically provided by law.

*   *   *

COMMENT: The guardian ad litem, whether a lawyer or a volunteer, shall comply with all appropriate codes of ethics and conduct regarding confidentiality.

STANDARD  8.0  The Court Process

The guardian ad litem will review the progress of a child's case through the court process and advocate for timely hearings.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  The harmful effects of prolonged foster care and a lack of permanency planning for children are serious and well documented.  Foster Children in the Courts, Edited by Mark Hardin, 1983.


STANDARD 9.0  Relating the Court Process to the Child

The guardian ad litem will explain, when appropriate, the court process and the role of the guardian ad litem to the child.  The guardian ad litem will assure that the child is informed of the purpose of each court proceeding.  The guardian ad litem will assure the child that the child's opinions and feelings will be made known to the court even when not consistent with the recommendations of the guardian ad litem.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  To decrease the trauma to the child from attending court hearings, depositions and other proceedings, the guardian ad litem shall explain to the child what is happening and what is expected of the child in all proceedings involving the child.

STANDARD 10.0  Participation in Proceedings Outside the Courtroom
The guardian ad litem shall participate in the development and negotiation of any plans, orders and staffings that affect the best interests of the child.

The guardian ad litem shall monitor implementation of service plans and court orders to determine whether services ordered by the court are being provided in a timely manner.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  The guardian ad litem should be present and participate in staffings and meetings that impact the life of the child, including, but not limited to, permanency planning review team meetings and staffings within the educational and mental health settings.

STANDARD 11.0  Participation in Court Proceedings

The guardian ad litem shall appear at all court proceedings to represent the child's best interests.  As authorized by law, the guardian ad litem may present evidence and ensure that, where appropriate, witnesses are called and examined, including, but not limited to, foster parents and psychiatric, psychological, medical, or other expert witnesses.

In the event any new developments or significant changes in the child's circumstances occur during the pendency of the court process, the guardian ad litem may cause appropriate pleadings to be filed.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  The guardian ad litem should be present at all court proceedings involving the child, which may include depositions and other pre-trial proceedings.

STANDARD 12.0  Protecting the Child as Witness

The guardian ad litem in a pending case shall protect the interests of the child who is a witness in any judicial proceeding related to the case in which the guardian ad litem has been appointed.  The guardian ad litem shall explain, when appropriate, the court proceedings and process to the child.
*   *   *

COMMENT:  The guardian ad litem must protect the child from multiple depositions and repetitive examinations that are not in the child's best interests.  The guardian ad litem shall request that all parties give notice of any related proceedings or meetings involving the child and for any proposed contact between counsel for a party and a child.  In matters for which the guardian ad litem is appointed, the guardian ad litem shall be present during any conferences between counsel for a party and the child.

STANDARD 13.0  Conflicts of Interest

If it is determined that the recommendations of the guardian ad litem are not in agreement with the wishes of the child, the court shall be informed by the guardian ad litem.  

*   *   *

COMMENT:  There must be no conflict of interest that makes it difficult for the guardian ad litem to present recommendations that are consistent with the child's best interests.  At any time during the proceedings in order to avoid a conflict of interest, the guardian ad litem, whether a lawyer or a volunteer, must inform the court of the child's preferences even though different from his or her recommendations.  

STANDARD 14.0  Recommendations to the Court


The guardian ad litem shall present recommendations to the court on the basis of the evidence presented and provide reasons in support of these recommendations.  When authorized by law, the guardian ad litem may offer evidence to the court.  If the guardian ad litem testifies, the guardian ad litem shall be duly sworn as a witness and be subject to cross-examination.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  The guardian ad litem shall ensure the court's receipt of independent, objective information.  To make a decision that serves the child's best interests, the court must have knowledge of the child's circumstances from all sources including the parents, caseworker, and deputy juvenile officer.  If the guardian ad litem has information that he or she believes to be relevant from his or her own independent investigation, the guardian ad litem should testify.

STANDARD  15.0  Court Orders


The guardian ad litem should request orders that are clear, specific, and, where appropriate, include a time line for the assessment, services, placement, treatment and evaluation of the child and the child's family.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  All court orders should clearly reflect the requirements and expectations of each party so that stability for the child is achieved as soon as possible.

STANDARD 16.0  Training of Guardian ad litem


No person shall be appointed as guardian ad litem without first completing twelve hours of specialized training.  Thereafter, to continue to be appointed as a guardian ad litem, a person shall complete six hours of specialized training annually.  Completion of the training hours shall be evidenced by an affidavit filed with the appointing court by July 31 of each year.  The court may accept, in lieu of the initial twelve hours of specialized training, an equivalent number of hours of experience as a guardian ad litem prior to the effective date of the adoption of these standards.

The specialized training shall include, but is not limited to, the following topics:

1.  Dynamics of child abuse and neglect issues;
2.  Factors to consider in the determining the best interests of the child, including permanency planning;
3.  Inter-relationships between family system, legal process and the child welfare system;
4.  Mediation and negotiation skills;
5.  Federal, state and local legislation and case law affecting children;
6.  Cultural and ethnic diversity and gender-specific issues;
7.  Family and domestic violence issues;
8.  Available community resources and services;
9.  Child development issues;
10. Guardian ad litem standards.

Programs providing guardian ad litem training to meet the provisions of this standard shall be accredited by the Supreme Court of Missouri's judicial education committee.

*   *   *

COMMENT:  Guardian ad litem practice is unique and complex and, as such, requires special education, training and experience.  The guardian ad litem needs an understanding of family dynamics and child development in order to evaluate observed and reported behaviors.  The guardian ad litem must interpret lengthy case information, which may include references to stress and abuse syndromes, physical determinations of abuse, causal factors in abuse and neglect, and the concepts of treatment designed to address abusive behaviors.  The guardian ad litem must be able to understand these references and see how determinations of probable cause are developed, how and why treatment programs are prescribed, and how to incorporate these references into his or her recommendations for the best interest of the child.

The guardian ad litem is not expected to make diagnostic or therapeutic recommendations but is expected to provide an information base from which to draw resources.  Therefore, the guardian ad litem must have a working knowledge of family dynamics and be able to compare and relate this concept to the observations, reports and documentation received regarding the child and the child's family.
Back to top