First Adopted: June 28, 2022
Most Recently Effective: July 01, 2026
Rule 84 | Rules of Civil Procedure | Rules Relating to All Appellate Courts | Procedure in All Appellate Courts
84.015 | Redaction Requirements
(a) Redaction of Confidential Information. Unless otherwise ordered
by the court, any counsel, party, or other person offering any filing
that is not a confidential record, as defined in Court Operating Rule
4.24(a), shall redact confidential information, as defined in Court
Operating Rule 4.24(b), in the filing. If the filing is a confidential
record that will later become public automatically by operation of law
or court rule, the filer shall redact confidential information in it.
Except for other information that is sealed, expunged, or closed by
statute or Supreme Court rule, no other redactions shall be allowed,
except by leave of the court for good cause shown.
(b)
Responsibility for Redaction. For all filings in any court, the
responsibility for redacting confidential information rests solely with
the counsel, parties, or any other person offering the filing. Courts
will not review each filing to ensure compliance and cannot refuse to
accept a filing on that basis.
(c) Manner of
Redaction. All redactions shall be done in a manner that makes it clear
that information has been redacted. If it is necessary to reference the
redacted information in a redacted filing, filers shall use generic
descriptors.
When a filer redacts information from a filing offered in any court, the filer also must contemporaneously file either:
(1) a confidential unredacted version of the filing; or
(2)
a confidential redacted information filing sheet that sets out the
information redacted from the filing with an explanation as to where the
information was redacted in the filing or the generic descriptors used
in the filing to reference the redacted information.
(d)
Compliance Certification. When offering a filing, all filers shall
affirmatively certify compliance with the redaction requirements in
Rules 19.10, 55.025, and 84.015. This certification shall be
accomplished through an automated process implemented in the electronic
filing system for its authorized users or, for filers who are not
authorized users of the electronic filing system, by a paper form
attached to the filing or on the filing itself.
(e)
Motion to Correct Redaction. Any party, or the court on its own motion,
may move to correct improperly redacted filings with the court. The
court shall dispose of such motion within 30 days. If the court
determines the filer acted in bad faith by failing to redact
confidential information or by redacting information that is not
otherwise confidential without leave of the court, the court may impose
appropriate sanctions to remedy such conduct. When a motion is filed
alleging a filing is improperly redacted, the clerk shall make the
filing inaccessible to the public in the manner provided in the
statewide court automation system. If the court determines the filing is
properly redacted, the clerk shall make the filing available once again
for public access.
(f) Exceptions. Judges and
judicial court staff shall not be required to certify compliance with
the redaction requirements or file confidential redacted information
filing sheets.
(g) Transcripts of Open Court
Proceedings. Any transcript of an open court proceeding offered for
filing in any court is not subject to the redaction requirements. After a
transcript of an open court proceeding has been filed, any party may
move using the procedures set out in subdivision (e) of this Rule to
redact from the transcript otherwise confidential information as
identified in Court
Operating Rule 4.24(b). If the court sustains the
motion, the movant must file a redacted transcript, and the unredacted
transcript will remain inaccessible to the public in the manner provided
in the statewide court automation system.
(Adopted June 28, 2022, effective July 1, 2023; amended December 16, 2025, effective July 1, 2026.)